What is a mate?

I have this notion of a mate. A mate, that is, as in ‘hand fasted’, as in ‘married to’, as in ‘cherished life companion’. A mate as in ‘the co-parent of my children’ and ‘the one that shares my life’. That kind of mate.

Changes in the past

Fifty or sixty years ago, many religious leaders panicked. The 1960s with the Summer of Love, Woodstock and its rampant, public sexuality and nudity and drug use, and perhaps even worse than the sexuality, the openly practiced promiscuity. In a way, these community and religious leaders were fighting a losing battle, as fashion ads and a fickle media came to titillate and entice Americans to buy, to be ‘modern’ in their mores and attitudes. The rock and roll of the 1950s and 1960s brought sex and promiscuity into the homes. Playboy magazine became an accepted national publication, not just a hidden book of smut (they had been around for centuries).

Add in Women’s Liberation. What I recall of the Women’s Lib beginnings is tainted (I was never a woman, to my knowledge). But the greatest outrage was that many crafts, professions, and trades were considered ‘men only’. The mostly Christian culture at the time held pretty close to the Biblical teachings of ‘Man is the head of the house; woman is the wife and keeper of the home and raiser of the children.” Back 20 years before, America like most of Europe had sent many of its young men, and many not so young, to fight in World War II, and drew women into the factories and other work positions to enable the war effort. Most men were out of the country at the time, so they never saw what that meant to the home, with Mom off at work – until they returned. After the war, as the armies were disbanded and soldiers returned home, their notions of family and home were dreams of what they had known before leaving.

Which left a certain amount of tension smoldering. Advertisers pushing cosmetics and an ‘urban’ and ‘sophisticated’ image – and lucrative market – created a demand for appliances, for cosmetics, for a life lived in the public eye, with life values played out as if every woman were a movie star.

Today we look at Ma and Pa Kettle – revered comedy movie stars, in their day – and cannot imagine the lifestyle they portray. The snapshot they lampoon of life during the Great Depression was actually reasonably affluent for the time. They had secure shelter, food, their clothes were not new but in fair condition.

Contrast that with one of the transition series, The Dick Van Dyke Show, with Mary Tyler Moore. This set and life still defined woman as “wife” – the working craftsman Rose Marie was single, to avoid crossing that particular barrier. But the furniture, the clothes, and fashions – these were all very effective in pushing the advertised, marketed values of fashion and cosmetics into the average American home.

Somewhere in there, despite the “Summer of Love”, “Make Love Not War”, “Free Love” generation, the way a mate was chosen saw a bit of change.

Instead of looking for a man of standing in the church and community, a man of good character and family (‘breeding’), instead what was important was good cash flow – expensive gifts or extravagant parties. Public drinking, alcohol and expensive foods on dates, dates without chaperones. These replaced any ‘old fashioned’ nonsense.

Fascination with movies and fashion elevated music, movie, and TV stars. Local guys learned to appeal to women as if they were dashing, and accomplished, and fun. Women began to use fashion to dress and act the part of seductress, as men learned to seduce – rather than to coldy examine a potential partner for being suitable as co-parent and life mate. Choices to marry began to be individual, and not guided by family and parents.

Today

We like to think that what we do today is eternal truth, and that we will be happy if we just do things a bit better.

The right lipstick, the right cologne, the right nekkid picture sent to the right guy, and we will get the attention of the one we will marry. We can read about how Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus (Or Women are from Venus, Men are Idiots). We can look on Facebook and count up the number of friends, the killer apps.

The Untold Story

A decade ago or so, the rise in teenage pregnancy rates became a national issue. One campaign focused on a half-baked ‘Just Say No’ simple abstinence plan. What occurred to me is that the problem was really, really basic.

When should you have sex?

You won’t like the answer I came up with.

You should have sex in a mated, shared-life relationship. With a mate chosen to be a desirable co-parent to your children and life mate.

And you should plan on raising children when you enter a shared life relationship. Thus, you should only be with the person(s) you have chosen for an adult role in your shared life.

The recreational sex part, the fashion and titillating sexy-as-cute-and-fun part? The reality is these stem from manipulating you for profit (by the fashion and cosmetics industry, and others out to exploit your body and your money). In my view, ItsAboutMakingBabies.com.

Confusion

What this means is that in the 50 to 80 years since the initial, Biblical definition of what it means to be a man and woman in a family way began to erode, we have had two or three generations now when the parents have lost touch with what it means to select a life mate, rather than shop for a cute fashion statement, or fun sex partner.

And America has lost the answer to the question – why should our children make babies? If we could teach them when, and why to make babies, then the rest should be much simpler.

When?

In December 2006 (New year’s eve!) I wrote about Family Values for Dating. No sex until your parents – or trusted friends – approve of the candidate on the basis of being a good co-parent and life mate. This still makes sense to me.

We have to realize, that when we couple-up, join our attention and time with another, we are actively participating in our community. As a couple we make different decisions that we did when single, and our community treats us differently as well. That first act of sex should be special, and intimate – but it isn’t a private, personal-only act like brushing our teeth. We should be assured that our prospect stands up to scrutiny, and that we have some family and community assent that he/she is a reasonable and appropriate choice. Not because we need permission, but because what we contemplate will have a noticeable and long lasting impact on our family and friends.

And we cannot make a reasoned choice for intimate companion, if we don’t have good ties with our parents, or at least a handful of trusted friends.

Posted in culture, mate candidate, selecting | Tagged , | Leave a comment

br: Missing the bad boy

NML at Baggage Reclaim (you will see many posts start this way!) talks about the “I Can’t Believe They Don’t Want Me Syndrome” This is where someone engages to share their affection, time, and devotion – with someone unsuitable.

And then, when the unsuitable clown wanders off to someone else, the cry is “I can’t believe he left me!” She isn’t as pretty, or as smart, or as generous, or as forgiving. Et cetera. She (in this case) seems to need validation, that she was “good enough” for him.

It’s almost like it doesn’t matter what shitty qualities these guys have – we want the validation.

The problem is not missing the bad boy

The first thing to recognize is that this reaction is to be expected. Only, it is not validation, so much, as it is a normal part of the cycle of grief. Grief – as in when a loved one dies, or is lost from our lives. Our mind might realize that The One We Chose is alive, merely not around, but the body knows that “Gone is Gone.” Thus we grieve as the bonds to the Departed exert pressures on us, forces forged in genetic memory, a relic of surviving as a community, as a species, as a family.

Grief. The (Elizabeth Kubler-Ross) cycle of stages, recognized as: Denial; Anger; Bargaining; Depression; and Acceptance. These stages occur in different orders, and repeat differently, for each person, and for each loss. “The heart doesn’t count seasons as the world does.” (Kung Fu TV show)

Is the “Why wasn’t I good enough” part of denial or bargaining? I don’t know, I am not convinced they are different, and it doesn’t matter.

Validation, a weakness or red flag?

NML addresses the issue of validation, of letting yourself depend on the opinions on others to define your own worth.

Validation is a part of everyone’s lives. Parents use approval or disapproval as a (very) powerful force to encourage desired behavior, and discourage unwanted behavior. Employers use feedback, the larger context for validation, in the form of reprimands, warnings, promotions, raises, and firing.

A greeting, whether from family, friend, or stranger, is a blessing on the day. The often trite recognition and acceptance we receive is positive feedback – validation. We all view the day as brighter with each greeting we receive or exchange – the balance of blessings has been tipped, after all.

A snub, insult, or shunning diminishes us, as well as diminishes the person offering disrespect.

Feedback is how relations with others help us grow and guides us

A conscious choice

Feed back – validation – is a measure of achieving a goal. Validation is never a fruitful goal.

Enjoy donuts? Eat a bunch – and you grow satiated. Want to feel happy? Chase happiness and you lose all that is of real value – healthy emotional bonds, knowledge of yourself, engagement with your community, a strong and healthy family life. Enjoy winning? Gamble for more chances to win – and even when you win the gamble or survive the risk, you lose the respect of others, your trust in people (opposing gamblers!), and you fail those that depend on you for honor, integrity, an example of wholesome living, and what you might have contributed to the well being of yourself and others.

Validation as a goal is a problem.

Validation, applause, winning, acceptance – as a goal, they share a common failing. They don’t endure, and they don’t represent completion when validation is the goal. “Success” is never enough. More just leads to wanting even more.

Your sense of worth of yourself should be strong enough to actively choose who you will and will not associate with. You should have respect for yourself, to want to be an asset to your family, to your friends, and to your community. Your should have respect for the culture of the home and community you were raised in, and the community you have chosen to live in now.

Validation as a result of living a respectful, honorable life is a blessing and reward.

Don’t confuse the two.

What does “seeking validation” mean?

When you seek validation, several things are going on. For one – you have lost your goal. When you build your life on something solid, something fundamentally true and steadfast, approval or disapproval guides you to focus your energies and your attention on improving your actions and correcting mistakes (anything that diverts energy and attention from your goals), especially mistakes that cost or hurt others.

When you skip that first step, and strive for glory, or the happy home – the approval and disapproval of others becomes a path to chaos, to madness. And leaves you open to abuse and manipulation by the predators of the world.

Grow or die

In school I was taught that the one rule in biology is Grow or Die. Any organism or group of organisms will grow and flourish – or begin to die, to diminish in numbers or health.

Choosing to live includes selecting the “community” we will live and work in. Relationships between members of healthy families and communities are usually disciplined. There is usually respect for each other, that might be expressed in different ways in different communities.

When we choose who to spend time with – we establish a community. Friends, family – lovers.

When we choose to bless someone with our time and energy, we might consider what that choice means in context with a healthy, respectful, disciplined (honest and honorable), trusting community. Sometimes this considerations as “meeting someone I could take home to meet Mother,” a euphemism for being someone acceptable and respectable in the community. When we choose for individual, chance-of-the-moment reasons, or for fantasies – validation – the results are pretty predictable, that someone will get hurt.

An “affair of the heart”, a fling, a tryst in secret, these are all choices made in search of “sexual fulfillment” in despite of the soul’s need for enrichment and light.

Choosing the bad boy.

The problem with missing the bad boy is choosing a bad boy. You choose a bad boy to rebel against parents or other teachers or wise people. You choose a bad boy for specific kinds of feedback or validation.

You choose a bad boy because you don’t feel worthy of better. And a bad boy will surely bring home to you the message that you deserve him. Otherwise you wouldn’t have him in your life. You would have left, rejected him, or thrown him out, if you had bothered to make his acquaintance in the first place.

You cannot look to others to make you a whole and healthy individual, a respected and trusted member of your family and community.

But you can choose to cherish people of respect and honor. And learn to love from among that class of people. You can choose to spend your time with people that value and contribute to family and community, that respect and trust good people.

And if you aren’t meeting good boys and good men, and good women, too, that can change.

Choose to live and love among good people.

Sounds simple, doesn’t it?

Posted in culture | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Welcome!

In a previous life, Dr. Annie approached the topic of being smart at love from a perspective of knowledge.  Her studies and degrees, and her therapy and counseling practice enabled her to observe and understand the conflicts and misunderstandings that many go through.

Very few people need sound, competent advice, when everything is going well and the people in their lives are at least as honorable and competent as themselves.

Which brings me back to . . me. I don’t have the studies, and counseling experience (not paid, at least – I have always treasured my own insights). And brings me to what I offer here, at SmartAtLove.com

I grew up fairly clueless, and a bit nerdy, too, in a conservative home.  At home we went to a Lutheran church, in a remote, isolated rural area.  May City, IA boasted a population of 75 around 1965 – counting farms within 5 miles, and shows seven blocks on Google Maps today.  My dad farmed, Mom worked part time.  I served 7 years in the US Navy, got my BS in computer science, and have been stranded “between jobs” since 2001.  This is the important part – I have had too much time to think.

Trying to make ends meet had me trying new things, and meeting new people.  Doris was wonderful, a gifted and experienced Crafter.  She helped me set up and survive my first craft shows (steel cutouts).  And also got me thinking about dating again.  Our time together was mostly work or friend time, but we did touch on some personal topics.

In 2004/5 I did some substitute teaching.  This was interesting, and tough, too.  Classroom discipline is the art of keeping a room full of student’s attention focused on the work at hand.  I floundered from one recommended resource to another – and lucked out, when I found “Tools for Teaching“.  This is one immensely empowering book.  The classroom specifics might seem uninteresting – until you realize that the “red zone” rule – a child’s attention wanders if the teacher doesn’t pass within 4-5 feet every minute or three.  Which is the solution to children running about the grocery store – keep them within 4 feet, and your time between meltdowns increases.  Let them wander farther, and they establish their own impetus for exploring and interacting with the world.  There are lots of insights and guides for parents, for teachers, and administrators.  Even older students can infer some useful pointers.  Great book.

And Tools for Teaching got me started looking for clues to behavior.

While subbing at a High School English class, a question on an assigned “describe an ideal date” exercise started me thinking.  I challenged one girl, “If he won’t be a good mate and co-parent for your children – how can you afford to spend time with him now?”  My blog ItsAboutMakingBabies.com came from that.

I started ItsAboutMakingBabies with two complaints.  First, that fashion and cosmetics are properly applied to courting rituals, and have nothing to do with beauty or being “pretty” or fun.  Sexy, provocative, these have to do with making babies.  The second complaint was that, as a society, we have no clear firm and clear purpose to teach our children: Why should we make babies?  In particular, why should I, or you, or your child, prepare for, select a mate for, build a home for, and make a baby?

It took me about four years to come to an answer that satisfies me, for now.  We make babies to preserve the family, the community, and the nation we belong to. If we respect and honor the home we grew up in, the adult roles we learned will be moved to make babies to express our respect and honor for the home and culture we were raised in, by instructing children in those values and experiences that formed us.

Following various blogs that seemed to make sense, or were entertaining, I discovered NML at BaggageReclaim.co.uk.  Baggage Reclaim is a special and wonderful resource for those people that find all relationships go bad sooner or later, and mostly sooner – but they want to find a way out of the bad relationship zone.

Posted in culture | Tagged , | 1 Comment